This blog is part of thinking activity.
- Assigned by Dilip Barad sir
🌺 More Information about the Novel Hard Times :- Click here
∆ Write on any one or as many topics as you can :-
1) Review of the Hindi play based on 'Hard times'.
2) Discuss the theme of Utilitarianism with illustrations from the novel hard times / or / discuss any other theme of your choice
4) Discuss the view of F.R.Leavis and J.B.priestley on 'Hard times' . With whom do you agree ? Why?
5) Comparative study of ' Hard times' and Hindi film 'Tamasha '.
So I am writing of the answer Que. 4 & 5.
Que :- 4
Discuss the view of F.R.Leavis and J.B.priestley on 'Hard times' . With whom do you agree ? Why?
Ans.
 |
| F.R.Leavis & J.B.Priestley |
Frank Raymond "F. R." Leavis (14 July 1895 – 14 April 1978) was an English literary critic of the early-to-mid-twentieth century. He taught for much of his career at Downing College, Cambridge, and later at the University of York.
∆ J.B.Priestley :-
John Boynton Priestley OM (13 September 1894 – 14 August 1984) was an English novelist, playwright, screenwriter, broadcaster and social commentator.
🌸 Now writing the view of F.R.Leavis and J.B.priestley on 'Hard times' . With whom do you agree ? Why?
Introduction :
Charles Dickens' novel 'Hard Times' has been a subject of literary analysis and debate for generations. Two prominent literary critics, F.R. Leavis and J.B. Priestley, offered differing views on this classic work.
In this blog, we will delve into their perspectives and consider which interpretation holds more merit.
• F.R. Leavis's View:
F.R. Leavis, a prominent figure in literary criticism, had a critical and somewhat scathing perspective on 'Hard Times.' Leavis argued that Dickens failed to create fully realized characters in the novel. He believed that the characters were mere caricatures, lacking depth and complexity. Leavis also criticized the book for its lack of moral seriousness, accusing it of being overly concerned with satirical elements rather than addressing the pressing social issues of the time.
Leavis's main contention was that 'Hard Times' fell short in its portrayal of the harsh realities of industrialization and the dehumanizing effects of utilitarianism. He saw Dickens as failing to provide a compelling critique of these societal issues, considering it a missed opportunity for a more profound exploration of the human condition.
• J.B. Priestley's View :
On the other hand, J.B. Priestley had a more sympathetic view of 'Hard Times.' He appreciated Dickens' satirical approach and the way he used exaggerated characters to highlight the absurdities of the society of his time. Priestley argued that Dickens' caricatures were a deliberate choice to make a powerful and memorable impact on the reader. He believed that the caricatures were effective tools for conveying Dickens' message about the dehumanizing effects of industrialization and utilitarianism.
Priestley also praised Dickens for his moral stance and his concern for social justice. He saw 'Hard Times' as a powerful indictment of the dehumanizing effects of a society obsessed with profit and efficiency. According to Priestley, Dickens' novel served as a warning against the dangers of valuing materialism over human well-being.
• Agreeing with J.B. Priestley :
While both critics made valid points, I find myself more aligned with J.B. Priestley's perspective on 'Hard Times.' Dickens' use of caricatures, while at times bordering on the extreme, serves a purpose. These exaggerated characters are memorable precisely because they highlight the absurdity and cruelty of the society Dickens is critiquing. Moreover, Dickens' moral stance and his call for social justice are evident throughout the novel, making it a compelling commentary on the issues of the time.
Conclusion :
In the debate between F.R. Leavis and J.B. Priestley's views on 'Hard Times,' the latter's perspective resonates more with me. Dickens' novel, with its caricatures and satirical elements, effectively conveys the message about the dehumanizing effects of industrialization and utilitarianism. While Leavis' critique is valuable in highlighting areas where the novel falls short, Priestley's appreciation for Dickens' intentions and moral stance offers a more compelling interpretation of this classic work. Ultimately, 'Hard Times' remains a significant literary work that continues to provoke thought and discussion about the human condition and societal values.
Que :- 5
Comparative study of ' Hard times' and Hindi film 'Tamasha '.
Ans.
Introduction :
Literature and cinema have been powerful mediums to explore and express the human experience. Charles Dickens' novel "Hard Times" and Imtiaz Ali's Hindi film "Tamasha" are two distinct yet intriguing works of art that delve into the complexities of life, identity, and societal expectations. While one is a classic literary work from the 19th century, the other is a contemporary Bollywood film.
In this comparative study, we will explore the thematic similarities and differences between these two works and how they reflect the human condition.
1) Themes of Conformity and Individuality:
Both "Hard Times" and "Tamasha" tackle the theme of conformity versus individuality.
In "Hard Times," Dickens criticizes the industrial society's obsession with facts and figures, where individuality is suppressed in favor of strict adherence to utilitarianism. Characters like Thomas Gradgrind embody this conformity.
In "Tamasha," the protagonist, Ved, struggles with conforming to societal expectations versus embracing his true self and passions. The film explores how conforming to societal norms can stifle creativity and individuality.
2) The Search for Identity :
Identity is a central theme in both works. In "Hard Times," characters like Louisa Gradgrind and Stephen Blackpool grapple with their identities in a society that demands conformity. They seek to discover who they truly are amidst the pressures of their environment.
"Tamasha" explores identity through Ved's journey of self-discovery. He presents different personas to society, conforming to societal expectations until he encounters Tara, who encourages him to embrace his true self. This reflects the idea that one's true identity should not be suppressed for the sake of conformity.
3) The Role of Imagination and Creativity :
Imagination and creativity are celebrated in both "Hard Times" and "Tamasha." Dickens portrays the importance of imagination through characters like Sissy Jupe, who values creativity over rigid education. Imagination is seen as a source of hope and liberation.
In "Tamasha," Ved's transformation into Don encourages him to unleash his creativity and break free from societal constraints. The film emphasizes the power of storytelling and creativity in shaping one's identity.
4) Social Commentary :
"Hard Times" provides a scathing critique of the harsh realities of the industrial era, highlighting the dehumanizing effects of the utilitarian philosophy on individuals and communities. Dickens calls for a more compassionate society that values human emotions and connections.
"Tamasha" comments on contemporary societal pressures, where individuals often feel compelled to conform to societal expectations. It encourages viewers to question these norms and rediscover their authentic selves.
Conclusion :
"Hard Times" and "Tamasha" may belong to different time periods and artistic mediums, but they share common themes that resonate with audiences across generations. Both works explore the tension between conformity and individuality, the search for identity, and the importance of imagination and creativity. Whether through Dickens' eloquent prose or Imtiaz Ali's cinematic storytelling, these narratives remind us of the enduring human struggle to find our true selves in a world that often demands conformity.
No comments:
Post a Comment