Paper No. 209

 

Code 22416: Paper 209: Research Methodology

Plagiarism: Trap –Consequences,Forms,  Types, and How to Avoid It

Table of Content : 

Personal Information

Assignment Details

Abstract 

Key Words

Introduction

Conclusion

Reference 

Personal Information

Name : Khushi R. Rathod

Batch : 2023-25

Roll No : 16

Enrollment Number : 5108230039

Semester : 4

E- mail : khushirathod1863@gmail.com

Assignment Details

Paper No : 206

Paper Code : 22413

Paper Name : Research Methodology

Topic : Plagiarism: Trap –Consequences,Forms,  Types, and How to Avoid It

Submitted to : Smt.S.B.Gardi, Department of English,MKBU

Abstract 

Plagiarism is a common problem in schools, colleges, and professional work. It harms honesty and the true value of learning and writing. This assignment looks closely at what plagiarism means, where it started, and how the idea of writing your own work has changed over time. It explains the different types of plagiarism—like copying on purpose, copying by mistake, mixing others' words with your own (mosaic writing), using your own old work again (self-plagiarism), and giving credit to the wrong person (ghostwriting). The paper also discusses why people plagiarize, such as not knowing the rules, trying to get better marks, or copying from the internet. Most importantly, it gives simple and helpful ways to avoid plagiarism, like citing sources properly, rewriting ideas in your own words, and following ethical rules. The goal of this work is to help students and writers stay honest, creative, and responsible in their work.

Key Words : 

Plagiarism, Forms, Academic Integrity, Self-Plagiarism, Mosaic Writing, Ghostwriting, Ethical Writing, Citation, Paraphrasing, Intellectual Theft, Avoiding Plagiarism, Research Ethics.

Introduction : 

Plagiarism is a serious ethical and academic offense involving the use of someone else’s ideas or words without proper acknowledgment. More than just copying, it is a form of intellectual theft that violates values like honesty and originality (Kumar, 2022). Historically, copying wasn't always condemned, but attitudes changed during the Renaissance, leading to the first copyright law in 1709 to protect authors (Grossberg, 2008).

In today's digital age, while the internet has made information easily accessible, it has also increased opportunities for plagiarism. However, technological tools now help detect and prevent it (Grossberg, 2008). Plagiarism may be intentional or accidental, but in both cases, it damages the credibility and integrity of the individual (Roka, 2017).

DEFINITION OF PLAGIARISM

Derived from the Latin word plagiatius ("kidnapper"), to plagiarize means"tocommitliterary theft" and to "present as new and original an idea or product derived from an existing source"

 According to the Cambridge Dictionary, plagiarism is defined as “the process or practice of using another person’s ideas or work and pretending that it is your own” (Cambridge Dictionary, 2025).

Plagiarism involves two kindsofwrongs.Using another person's ideas, information, or expressionswithout acknowledging that person's work constitutes intellectual theft. Passing off another person's ideas, information, or expressions as your own to get a better grade or gain some other advantage constitutes fraud. Plagiarism is sometimes a moral and ethical offense ratherthan a legal one since some instances of plagiarism fall outside the scopeof copyright infringement, a legal offense.

Consequences of Plagiarism

1. Undermines Public Trust: 

Plagiarism violates the standards of accuracy and credibility expected in fields like education, journalism, business, and government. Readers may feel skeptical or outraged when they discover plagiarized work, breaking trust between writer and audience.

2. Disrespects Original Work:

Failing to credit sources disregards the intellectual labor of original authors. It prevents readers from verifying or analyzing the cited ideas accurately.

3. Damages Professional Reputation:

Writers caught plagiarizing are seen as either incompetent or dishonest. Journalists or professionals exposed for plagiarism often lose their jobs and face public humiliation and long-term career setbacks.

4. Severe Academic Penalties for Students:

Students may receive a failing grade, course failure, or even face expulsion. It damages the student-teacher relationship, turning educators into enforcers instead of mentors.

5. Harms Institutional Integrity:

Plagiarism affects public perception of academic institutions. If graduates lack genuine skills due to dishonest practices, the value of their degrees and the reputation of their institutions are compromised.

6. Loss of Learning Opportunity:

Students who plagiarize miss out on learning essential academic skills like researching, analyzing, and writing effectively.

7. Career Impact:

Strong writing and research skills are necessary in careers such as law, journalism, teaching, business, and public service. Plagiarism limits a student’s or professional’s ability to grow in these fields.

8. Betrays Personal Expression:

Plagiarism undermines the development of a personal voice and individual creativity in writing. As Mark Rose points out, writing is deeply tied to one's identity and sense of self.

9. Ethical and Personal Consequences:

Understanding plagiarism helps writers maintain personal integrity and authenticity. Avoiding plagiarism is key to becoming a confident, responsible writer.

Forms of Plagiarism

1.  Repeating or Paraphrasing Wording

Paraphrasing means restating someone else's ideas or thoughts in our own words. However, even when paraphrasing, it is essential to preserve the original meaning and give proper credit to the source. Simply changing the wording without acknowledging the source still constitutes plagiarism.

Example from a Source:

The following passage is taken from page 94 of English Language Teaching (Methods, Tools & Techniques) by Dr. M.F. Patel and Praveen M. Jain:

Original Source:

"The communicative approach is a learner-centered approach. This approach gives the learner not only grammatical competence but also a social skill as to what to say, how to say, when to say, and where, in order to satisfy his daily needs as a larger aim."

If we paraphrase the above passage without giving credit, it is considered plagiarism, even though the wording is different:

Plagiarized Version:

The communicative approach focuses on the learner and develops the skill to use language in various social contexts. It provides exposure to real-life language use according to daily needs, rather than just focusing on grammar. It also teaches when, where, and how language should be used based on the situation.

Although this version uses different words, it presents the original idea without proper acknowledgment, making it a case of paraphrase plagiarism.

Correct Version with Citation (MLA Style):

As Dr. M.F. Patel and Praveen M. Jain have noted, the communicative approach focuses on the learner and helps develop the ability to use language in real-life social contexts. It emphasizes practical language use according to daily needs rather than solely teaching grammar. It also guides learners on how, when, and where to use language depending on the situation (94).

This version includes the author's names and the page number, following the MLA in-text citation format.

Works Cited:

Patel, M. F., and Praveen M. Jain. English Language Teaching: Methods, Tools & Techniques. Sunrise Publishers & Distributors, 2008.

2. Taking a Particularly Apt Phrase

 Plagiarism occurs not only when an entire passage is copied word-for-word but also when specific terms, ideas, or phrases coined by another author are used without proper acknowledgment. A well-known example is taken from George Orwell’s 1984.

Original Source:

“On each landing, opposite the lift shaft, the poster with the enormous face gazed from the wall. It was one of those pictures which are so contrived that the eyes follow you about when you move. BIG BROTHER IS WATCHING YOU, the caption beneath it ran.”

(1984, Orwell, p. 3)

If we use Orwell’s coined phrase without citing the source, we commit plagiarism—even if the sentence structure is different.

Plagiarized Version:

Time will come when we will be under constant surveillance which will keep watch on the public and private lives of the people that can be termed as BIG BROTHER IS WATCHING YOU.

In this sentence, the phrase "BIG BROTHER IS WATCHING YOU" has been borrowed without attribution, making it an example of plagiarism.

Correct Version with Citation:

Time will come when we will be under constant surveillance which will keep watch on the public and private lives of the people that George Orwell termed as BIG BROTHER IS WATCHING YOU (3).

This version properly credits the original author and provides a page reference, as per MLA style, allowing readers to locate the original source.

Works Cited:

Orwell, George. 1984. Secker & Warburg, 1949.

3. Paraphrasing an Argument or Presenting a Line of Thinking

Paraphrasing involves more than just changing words—it also includes borrowing an author’s ideas, arguments, or line of reasoning. If you use an author’s train of thought without giving credit, even if you use your own words, it still counts as plagiarism.

Original Source:

“Humanity faces a quantum leap forward... It faces the deepest social upheaval and creative restructuring of all time. Without clearly recognizing it, we are engaged in building a remarkable civilization from the ground up. This is the meaning of the Third Wave.
Until now the human race has undergone two great waves of change, each one largely obliterating earlier cultures or civilizations and replacing them with ways of life inconceivable to those who came before. The First Wave of change—the agricultural revolution—took thousands of years to play itself out. The Second Wave—the rise of industrial civilization—took a mere hundred years. Today history is even more accelerative, and it is likely that the Third Wave will sweep across history and complete itself in a few decades.”
(Alvin Toffler, The Third Wave [1980; New York: Bantam, 1981], p. 10)

Plagiarized Version:

There have been two revolutionary periods of change in history: the agricultural revolution and the industrial revolution. The agricultural revolution determined the course of history for thousands of years; the industrial civilization lasted about a century. We are now on the threshold of a new period of revolutionary change, but this one may last for only a few decades.

In this version, although the wording is different, the original sequence of thought and historical framework has been copied without acknowledgment, making it a case of plagiarism.

Correct Version with Citation:

According to Alvin Toffler, there have been two revolutionary periods of change in history: the agricultural revolution and the industrial revolution. The agricultural revolution determined the course of history for thousands of years; the industrial civilization lasted about a century. We are now on the threshold of a new period of revolutionary change, but this one may last for only a few decades (10).

This revised version properly credits the author and includes a parenthetical reference following MLA citation style.

Works Cited:

Toffler, Alvin. The Third Wave. 1980. New York: Bantam, 1981. Print.

Types of Plagiarism

1. Intentional or Unintentional 

Plagiarism can be intentional or unintentional. Intentional plagiarism happens when someone knowingly copies a full text, paragraph, or data and claims it as their own.

Unintentional plagiarism occurs when a person is unaware of similar research, does not understand writing ethics, or does not know how to properly cite sources, leading to accidental similarity with existing work.

2. Mosaic or Patch Writing 

Mosaic or patchwriting plagiarism happens when someone takes text from an existing article and changes words or phrases to make it look different without giving credit to the original author. 

The American Medical Association Manual of Style explains that this type of plagiarism involves mixing someone else’s ideas and words with one’s own, creating a misleading combination where the original source is not properly acknowledged.

3. Self Plagiarism 

Self-plagiarism happens when a person reuses their own work, such as a published article, book, or journal, and presents it as completely new without mentioning the original source or getting permission from the previous publisher.

Even though the content belongs to the same author, it is still considered unethical because it misleads readers and academic institutions by presenting old work as fresh research.

4. Ghost Writing 

Ghostwriting plagiarism happens when the real writer is not given credit, or when someone who did not help is listed as the author. This is unfair and dishonest because it hides who actually did the work. Giving credit to the right people keeps writing honest.

This type of plagiarism happens in schools, research, and publishing. When the real author is not acknowledged, it can mislead readers and harm academic honesty. It is important to recognize and appreciate everyone's contributions to maintain fairness and trust in writing.

How to avoid plagiarism 

1. Use Your Own Words: Understand the material and express ideas in your own way to ensure originality and deeper learning.
   
   

2. Paraphrase Properly: Don’t just change a few words—fully rephrase the content and cite the source correctly.
   
   

3. Cite All Sources: Always credit the original authors using proper citation styles like MLA, APA, or Chicago.
   
   

4. Use Quotation Marks: For direct quotes, enclose the text in quotation marks and include a citation.
   
   

5. Track Your References: Keep detailed records of sources to avoid accidental plagiarism.
   
   

6. Know Common Knowledge: No need to cite widely known facts, but always cite specific data or unique ideas.
   
   

7. Use Detection Tools: Tools like Turnitin or Grammarly can help check for unintentional plagiarism.
   
   

8. Avoid Self-Plagiarism: If reusing your own work, cite it to show transparency.
   
   

9. Manage Time Well: Good planning reduces the urge to copy due to last-minute pressure.
   
   

10. Follow Guidelines: Understand and adhere to your institution’s plagiarism policies to stay academically honest.

References : 

D, Deeptanshu, and Shubham Dogra. "Plagiarism in Research explained: The complete Guide."Typeset.io, 22 September 2022, https://typeset.io/resources/the-only-plagiarism-guide-you-will-need/.  Accessed 8 March 2025.

Grossberg, Michael. “History and the Disciplining of Plagiarism.” Originality, Imitation, and Plagiarism: Teaching Writing in the Digital Age, edited by Caroline Eisner and Martha Vicinus, University of Michigan Press, 2008, pp. 159–72. JSTOR, https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctv65sxk1.17.  Accessed 8 March 2025.

Kumar, Dr.Harish. "Plagiarism Overview: What A Research Scholar Should Know." International Journal of Health Sciences and Research, vol. 12, no. 7, July 2022, https://doi.org/10.52403/ijhsr.20220734. Accessed 9 April  2025.

Maurya, Anuradha. "(PDF) Plagiarism in Research: Problems and its Solutions." ResearchGate, 13 February 2024,https://www.researchgate.net/publication/374207896_Plagiarism_in_Research_Problems_and_its_Solutions.  Accessed 9 April 2025.

MLA Handbook for Writers of Research Papers. Modern Language Association of

America, 2009. Accessed 9 April 2025.

PLAGIARISM English meaning Cambridge Dictionary. Cambridge Dictionary,

https://dictionary.cambridge.org/dictionary/english/plagiarism . Accessed 9 April

2025.

Roka, Yam. "(PDF) Plagiarism: Types, Causes and How to Avoid This Worldwide

Problem." ResearchGate, December 2017,

https://www.researchgate.net/publication/326259880_Plagiarism_Types_Causes_and_How_to_Avoid_This_Worldwid e_Problem.  Accessed 9 April 2025.

Words : 2329

Paper No. 208

 

Code: 22415: Paper 208: Comparative Literature & Translation Studies

Shifting Terrains: Understanding Comparative Literature through Susan Bassnett’s What is Comparative Literature Today?

Table of Content : 

Personal Information

Assignment Details

Abstract 

Key Words

Introduction

Defining Comparative Literature

Key Concepts in Comparative Literature

Key Arguments and Theoretical Perspectives

Evolution and Challenges in Comparative Literature 

Conclusion

Reference 

Personal Information

Name : Khushi R. Rathod

Batch : 2023-25

Roll No : 16

Enrollment Number : 5108230039

Semester : 4

E- mail : khushirathod1863@gmail.com

Assignment Details

Paper No : 206

Paper Code : 22413

Paper Name : Comparative Literature & Translation Studies

Topic : Shifting Terrains: Understanding Comparative Literature through Susan Bassnett’s  What is Comparative Literature Today?

Submitted to : Smt.S.B.Gardi, Department of English,MKBU

Abstract

Comparative Literature is a dynamic and evolving field that explores literary texts across cultural, linguistic, and historical boundaries. Susan Bassnett’s work highlights the shifting nature of Comparative Literature, emphasizing its movement beyond Eurocentric perspectives towards a more inclusive, interdisciplinary approach. The field has increasingly incorporated translation studies, postcolonial theory, feminist perspectives, and digital humanities, allowing for a broader understanding of global literary interactions. However, challenges such as Eurocentrism, methodological crises, and cultural homogenization persist. As globalization reshapes literary studies, Comparative Literature must continue adapting by embracing new methodologies, engaging with marginalized voices, and fostering cross-cultural dialogues. This paper examines the evolution, challenges, and future of Comparative Literature, emphasizing its role in shaping literary studies in a globalized world.

Keywords : Comparative Literature, World Literature, Translation Studies, Interdisciplinary Approaches, Postcolonial Theory, Cultural Hybridity, Eurocentrism, Globalization, Digital Humanities, Marginalized Voices

Introduction

Comparative Literature is an evolving and interdisciplinary field that examines literary texts across different cultures, languages, and historical periods. It moves beyond the study of national literatures to explore the interconnections between texts, themes, and literary traditions on a global scale. As Susan Bassnett (1993) states, Comparative Literature is not confined to a single nation’s literary output but is a dynamic approach that fosters cross-cultural dialogues and expands the understanding of literature in a broader, global context. The field has witnessed significant transformations over time, particularly with the growing emphasis on postcolonial perspectives, translation studies, and the inclusion of marginalized voices.

Defining Comparative Literature

The term Comparative Literature has historically been debated among scholars regarding its scope and definition. According to Matthew Arnold, Comparative Literature emphasizes the interconnected nature of all literatures, arguing that no literary work can be fully understood in isolation but must be examined in relation to other texts and cultural influences (Bassnett). Johann Wolfgang von Goethe introduced the concept of Weltliteratur (World Literature), advocating for a literary tradition that transcends national borders and fosters unity among different cultures (Millet).

Key Concepts in Comparative Literature

Comparative Literature is an interdisciplinary field that seeks to analyze literary texts across different cultures, historical periods, and linguistic traditions. It examines how themes, motifs, and narrative structures are shared and transformed across geographical and temporal boundaries. As Susan Bassnett (1993) notes, Comparative Literature is not merely about comparing texts but about understanding their interrelations, cultural exchanges, and the broader intellectual movements that shape them.

1.   Comparative Literature as an Interdisciplinary Field

One of the defining characteristics of Comparative Literature is its interdisciplinary nature. Unlike national literature studies, which focus on texts within a single linguistic or cultural tradition, Comparative Literature bridges multiple disciplines, including history, philosophy, sociology, anthropology, and translation studies.

2. Literary Connections Across Cultures

Comparative Literature examines how texts influence and respond to one another across different cultural and linguistic contexts. For instance, the works of Indian, African, and Latin American writers often engage with European literary traditions while simultaneously resisting colonial narratives (Spivak, 2003). This intertextuality highlights the fluidity of literary movements and the dynamic exchanges that shape global literature.

3.  The Role of Translation in Comparative Literature

Translation plays a crucial role in Comparative Literature, as it allows texts to reach wider audiences and facilitates cross-cultural dialogue. David Damrosch (2003) argues that literature becomes "world literature" when it is translated and circulates beyond its original cultural context. However, translation is not a neutral process—it involves choices that can shape the meaning of a text. As Itamar Even-Zohar (1990) suggests, translation is especially significant in times of cultural change, as it helps societies integrate new ideas while preserving their literary heritage.

4. Literature and Historical Context

Comparative Literature also considers the historical and cultural contexts in which texts are produced and received. Literature does not exist in isolation; it reflects and responds to social, political, and economic conditions. For example, postcolonial literature critiques the legacy of colonialism by reinterpreting historical events from non-Western perspectives (Bhabha, 1994). Similarly, feminist comparative studies examine how gender roles and representations vary across cultures and literary traditions.

Key Arguments and Theoretical Perspectives

1. Beyond National and World Literature

Comparative Literature differs from national literature and world literature in fundamental ways:

• National Literature focuses on texts produced within a specific country and linguistic tradition.

• World Literature refers to literary texts that have achieved international recognition and circulation.

• Comparative Literature, however, investigates how texts interact with and influence each other across cultural and linguistic boundaries (Bassnett, 1993).

Goethe’s idea of Weltliteratur (World Literature) suggested that literature should be studied as a universal entity rather than within national confines (Millet, 2014). However, some critics argue that the concept of world literature risks homogenizing diverse literary traditions and reinforcing Western dominance in literary studies (Spivak, 2003).

2.  Cultural Interconnections and Influence

Comparative Literature examines how literary themes and ideas travel across time and space. Some key examples include:

• The influence of Shakespeare on world literature – Writers such as Rabindranath Tagore and Wole Soyinka have reinterpreted Shakespearean themes in their cultural contexts.

• Postcolonial adaptations of European literary forms – African and Indian writers have reshaped Western literary traditions to reflect indigenous experiences (Bhabha, 1994).

• The impact of globalization on literature – Increased literary exchanges have led to new hybrid forms, blending multiple cultural influences (Damrosch, 2003).

3.  Power Dynamics and Literary Representation

Comparative Literature is not just about similarities but also about power imbalances in literary production and reception. Postcolonial theorists like Edward Said (1978) and Homi Bhabha (1994) have highlighted how literature has been used to reinforce colonial ideologies. At the same time, Comparative Literature can serve as a tool for resistance by giving voice to marginalized perspectives.

• Homi Bhabha’s Concept of Hybridity – Literature from former colonies often combines indigenous and European elements, creating hybrid narratives that challenge colonial authority (Bhabha, 1994).

• Wole Soyinka’s Critique of Eurocentrism – Soyinka and other African intellectuals have argued against Western portrayals of African cultures as "primitive" (Millet, 2014).

• Spivak’s Theory of Subaltern Representation – Gayatri Chakravorty Spivak (2003) questions whether the voices of the subaltern (oppressed groups) can truly be represented in dominant literary discourses.
  
  

4.  Comparative Literature as a Constantly Evolving Field

The field of Comparative Literature is constantly adapting to new intellectual movements and cultural transformations. Some of the recent shifts include:

• The rise of feminist and queer literary studies – Expanding Comparative Literature to include gender and sexuality as central analytical categories.

• The impact of digital humanities – Using computational tools to analyze global literary trends.

• The environmental turn in literature – Examining ecological themes in literature from different cultures (Damrosch, 2003).
  
  

5.  Accessibility and the Role of Readers

Comparative Literature is not limited to academic scholars. Anyone who reads books from different cultures and explores their meanings is participating in Comparative Literature (Bassnett, 1993). This openness makes the field dynamic and inclusive, allowing it to evolve with new readers and perspectives.

Evolution and Challenges in Comparative Literature : 

Comparative Literature has evolved significantly over the centuries, shaped by shifting intellectual paradigms, global historical events, and emerging literary movements. From its early Eurocentric origins to its current focus on cross-cultural interactions and interdisciplinary approaches, the field has continuously adapted to new challenges. This section explores its historical development, key theoretical debates, and contemporary challenges.

1. Historical Development of Comparative Literature

1.1 Early Foundations (19th Century – Early 20th Century)

The roots of Comparative Literature can be traced back to the 19th century when scholars sought to analyze literature beyond national boundaries.

• Matthew Arnold’s View on Literary Interconnections : 

In his 1857 Inaugural Lecture at Oxford, Arnold emphasized that no single literature could be fully understood in isolation but must be examined in relation to other literary traditions (Bassnett, 1993).

• Goethe’s Concept of Weltliteratur : 

Johann Wolfgang von Goethe introduced the idea of World Literature (Weltliteratur), suggesting that literature should transcend national borders and be studied in a global context (Millet, 2014). This idea encouraged scholars to explore literary exchanges between different cultures.

• Benedetto Croce’s Critique of Comparative Literature : 

Croce (1903) argued that Comparative Literature was not a separate discipline but rather a part of literary history. He insisted that literature should be analyzed within its historical and cultural context, rather than through direct comparisons.

1.2. Mid-20th Century: The Crisis of Comparative Literature

By the mid-20th century, Comparative Literature faced several crises that led to intense theoretical debates.

• René Wellek’s “Crisis of Comparative Literature” (1950s) : 

Wellek pointed out that Comparative Literature lacked a clear methodology and was overly focused on European texts (Millet, 2014). The crisis led to questions about what should be included in Comparative Literature and how it should be studied.

• Charles Mills Gayley and François Jost’s Defense of the Field : 

Gayley and Jost argued that Comparative Literature should explore literature as a universal human experience shaped by cultural, social, and historical factors. They emphasized that Comparative Literature broadens the scope of literary studies by considering multiple perspectives.

1.3. Late 20th Century: The Rise of Postcolonial and Feminist Approaches

The latter half of the 20th century saw a shift in Comparative Literature as scholars began questioning its Eurocentric foundations.

• Postcolonial Critiques

1. Edward Said’s Orientalism (1978) exposed how Western literary traditions often portrayed non-European cultures in a stereotypical and inferior manner.

2. Homi Bhabha (1994) introduced the concept of hybridity, arguing that literary traditions are not isolated but are shaped by cross-cultural exchanges.

3. Wole Soyinka and other African intellectuals critiqued the portrayal of African literature in European frameworks, advocating for the inclusion of indigenous literary traditions (Millet, 2014).
   
   

• Feminist and Queer Literary Theories
  

1. Comparative Literature began incorporating feminist perspectives, examining gender roles and the representation of women in different literary traditions.

2. Gayatri Chakravorty Spivak (2003) emphasized the importance of including marginalized voices, particularly those of women and subaltern groups.

1.4. The Globalization of Comparative Literature in the 21st Century

With globalization, Comparative Literature has expanded to include non-Western perspectives, digital humanities, and environmental literature.

• David Damrosch’s Concept of “World Literature” : 

Damrosch (2003) argued that literature becomes world literature when it circulates beyond its original cultural context. He emphasized the role of translation in making literature accessible to global audiences.

• The Digital Turn : 

The use of digital tools and computational analysis has transformed how literary texts are studied across languages and cultures.

• Environmental and Ecocritical Approaches : 

Comparative Literature has begun addressing ecological themes, studying how different cultures represent nature and environmental issues in literature.

2. Challenges in Comparative Literature

While Comparative Literature continues to evolve, it faces several challenges that complicate its study and relevance in modern academia.

2.1. The Eurocentrism Debate

Despite efforts to diversify, Comparative Literature has historically been dominated by European literary traditions.

• The Legacy of Colonialism : 

Many early Comparative Literature studies focused on European works, often neglecting African, Asian, and Latin American literatures. Postcolonial theorists, including Spivak and Bhabha, argue that true Comparative Literature must break away from its Eurocentric roots and incorporate Global South perspectives (Spivak, 2003).

• Challenges in Representation : 

While the field has expanded, non-Western literature is still often studied through Western theoretical frameworks, which can distort its original meaning.

2.2. The Crisis of Methodology

• What Should Be Compared? 

One of the biggest challenges in Comparative Literature is defining what should be compared and why. Some scholars argue that literature should be analyzed within its cultural and historical context, while others advocate for cross-cultural thematic comparisons (Bassnett, 1993).

• Interdisciplinary Challenges : 

The field draws from various disciplines, making it difficult to establish a unified methodology. Should Comparative Literature focus more on textual analysis, historical context, or philosophical interpretations? The debate continues.

2.3. The Role of Translation

• Translation as a Necessity and a Limitation : 

Comparative Literature often relies on translated texts, but translation can alter meaning and nuance. As Even-Zohar (1990) notes, translation is particularly important in times of cultural transformation, but dominant cultures often control which texts are translated and how they are interpreted.

• Loss of Original Meaning : 

The challenge of accurately translating metaphors, cultural references, and linguistic styles remains a significant issue in Comparative Literature.

2.4. Globalization and Cultural Homogenization

• The Double-Edged Sword of Globalization : 

While globalization has made world literature more accessible, it has also contributed to cultural homogenization, where dominant languages and literary forms overshadow local traditions (Damrosch, 2003). Scholars worry that Comparative Literature might inadvertently erase cultural specificities by promoting a standardized global literary canon.

• Balancing Global and Local Perspectives : 

The challenge for Comparative Literature is to engage with global perspectives while preserving local literary traditions and cultural differences.

2.5. The Future of Comparative Literature

Interdisciplinary Growth : 

Comparative Literature is increasingly integrating fields such as sociology, digital humanities, and environmental studies. 

Representation of Marginalized Voices : 

The field must continue its efforts to include literature from underrepresented communities and languages.

Adapting to Digital and Technological Changes : 

The rise of artificial intelligence and big data analytics offers new ways to study literature but also poses ethical concerns regarding authorship and interpretation. 

Conclusion : 

Comparative Literature has evolved from a Eurocentric discipline into a more inclusive and interdisciplinary field, engaging with translation studies, postcolonialism, feminism, and digital humanities. Susan Bassnett’s article What is Comparative Literature Today? highlights how the field has expanded beyond national boundaries to foster cross-cultural literary dialogues while addressing challenges such as Eurocentrism, linguistic dominance, and methodological crises. Translation remains crucial for global literary exchange, yet it also raises ethical concerns about representation and meaning. The increasing integration of history, sociology, and technology has reshaped Comparative Literature, making it a dynamic and evolving discipline. As globalization influences literary studies, the field must continue to embrace marginalized voices, challenge dominant narratives, and adapt to digital transformations. Despite ongoing debates over its methodology and scope, Comparative Literature remains vital in bridging linguistic and cultural gaps, promoting a deeper understanding of world literature. Its future depends on its ability to remain open, flexible, and engaged with emerging literary and cultural movements in an ever-changing global landscape.

What is Comparative Literature Today? - Article by Susan Bassnett from HetalPathak10

References : 

Bassnett, Susan. Comparative Literature: A Critical Introduction. Blackwell, 1993.

Damrosch, David. What is World Literature? Princeton University Press, 2003.

Millet, Kitty. The Princeton Sourcebook in Comparative Literature. ResearchGate. http://www.researchgate.net/publication/263421832_The_Princeton_Sourcebook_in_Comparative_Literature_From_the_European_Enlightenment_to_the_Global_Present Accessed 11 April . 2025. 

Spivak, Gayatri Chakravorty. Death of a Discipline. Columbia University Press, 2003. http://cup.columbia.edu/book/death-of-a-discipline/9780231129442 Accessed 11 April . 2025.

Zohar, Itamar Even. Polysystem Studies. 1990. www.tau.ac.il/~itamarez/works/books/Even-Zohar_1990--Polysystem%20studies.pdf Accessed 11 April . 2025.

Words : 2468