Presentation : 210

  Paper No: 210

Presentation Topic : Global Capitalism and Cultural Hegemony_ Middle-Class Identity in Chetan Bhagat’s Novels ‘One Night @ the Call Center’ and ‘2 States : The Story of My Marriage’

Global Capitalism and Cultural Hegemony_ Middle-Class Identity in Chetan Bhagat’s Novels ‘One Night @ the Call Center’ and ‘2 States : The Story of My Marriage’ from KhushiRathod39

Presentation Video :

Presentation : 209

 Paper No: 209

Presentation Topic : Integrating Quotations in Research Writing_ Prose, Poetry, and Drama

Integrating Quotations in Research Writing_ Prose, Poetry, and Drama from KhushiRathod39

Presentation Video :

Presentation : 208

  Paper No: 208

Presentation Topic : “Translation and Literary History_ An Indian View” Ganesh Devy

“Translation and Literary History_ An Indian View” Ganesh Devy from KhushiRathod39

Presentation Video :

Presentation : 207

 Paper No: 207

Presentation Topic : From Coaching Centers to Capital Crimes_ A Comparative Study of ‘Revolution 2020’ and ‘The White Tiger’

From Coaching Centers to Capital Crimes_ A Comparative Study of ‘Revolution 2020’ and ‘The White Tiger’ from KhushiRathod39

Presentation Video :

Presentation : 206

  Paper No: 206

Presentation Topic : The Price of Motherhood: A Comparative Study of ‘The Joys of Motherhood’ and ‘We Need to Talk About Kevin’

The Price of Motherhood: A Comparative Study of ‘The Joys of Motherhood’ and ‘We Need to Talk About Kevin’ from KhushiRathod39

Presentation Video :

Pygmalion by G.B. Shaw

 

Introduction :

George Bernard Shaw’s Pygmalion is one of the most celebrated plays of the 20th century, offering a witty yet profound exploration of social class, transformation, and gender dynamics. First performed in 1913, the play is a sharp critique of the British class system and a commentary on the power of language in shaping identity. Inspired by the Greek myth of Pygmalion, where a sculptor falls in love with his own creation, Shaw’s play subverts the idea of transformation by questioning whether social mobility is truly liberating or merely an illusion.

Plot Summary

Pygmalion revolves around Professor Henry Higgins, a linguist and phonetics expert, who makes a bold wager with Colonel Pickering that he can transform Eliza Doolittle, a poor flower girl with a strong Cockney accent, into a refined lady who could pass as a duchess. Higgins undertakes this task by rigorously training Eliza in speech and manners, subjecting her to rigorous lessons in pronunciation, grammar, and social etiquette.

Eliza’s transformation is successful, and she impresses high society at an ambassador’s garden party. However, she soon realizes that despite her refined speech and appearance, she is still perceived as an outsider. This realization forces her to question her place in society and her own sense of identity. By the end of the play, she confronts Higgins, asserting her independence and rejecting the idea that he has control over her life.

Major Themes in Pygmalion

1. Class and Social Mobility

Shaw critiques the rigid British class system, emphasizing how people are judged based on their accents and social backgrounds rather than their intrinsic worth. Eliza’s transformation into a lady highlights the artificial nature of class distinctions—her change is superficial, dictated by speech and mannerisms rather than substance.

Despite acquiring the outward traits of an upper-class woman, Eliza remains trapped between two worlds. Society does not fully accept her as an aristocrat, yet she can no longer return to her former life. This dilemma reflects Shaw’s view that social mobility is not as liberating as it seems but rather a complex struggle between personal identity and societal expectations.

2. The Power of Language

Language in Pygmalion is not merely a means of communication but a tool of power and transformation. Higgins believes that proper speech dictates one’s place in society, reinforcing the idea that language is a social marker. By altering Eliza’s speech, he attempts to reshape her identity, but the play ultimately questions whether linguistic change alone is sufficient for true transformation.

Shaw suggests that language can grant access to opportunities but does not necessarily change a person’s core self. Eliza may speak like a lady, but she is still treated differently due to her origins. This critique extends to the broader idea that external markers of refinement often overshadow a person’s true worth.

3. Feminism and Gender Dynamics

Eliza’s journey is not just about class transformation but also about asserting her autonomy in a patriarchal society. Higgins sees her as his creation, much like the sculptor Pygmalion in the Greek myth, and assumes control over her development. However, Eliza refuses to be molded entirely by Higgins’ vision, challenging his authority by the end of the play.

Her confrontation with Higgins marks her shift from object to subject, as she claims her independence and rejects being treated as an experiment. Shaw’s portrayal of Eliza as a strong, self-reliant woman was progressive for his time, reinforcing feminist ideals of self-determination and equality.

4. The Illusion of Transformation

While Pygmalion appears to be a story of self-improvement, Shaw ultimately questions whether true transformation is possible. Eliza changes outwardly, but her social status remains uncertain. The play critiques the belief that superficial modifications—such as speech and dress—can lead to genuine change. Instead, it suggests that personal growth and self-respect are more meaningful than societal validation.

Character Analysis

1. Eliza Doolittle

Eliza is the heart of the play, undergoing the most significant transformation. Initially a poor flower girl with little confidence, she evolves into a poised and articulate woman. However, her transformation comes with emotional struggles, as she realizes that her new status does not equate to true acceptance. By the end of the play, she asserts her independence, proving that she is not merely a product of Higgins’ training but a person with her own agency.

2. Professor Henry Higgins

Higgins is a brilliant but arrogant phonetics professor who sees language as the key to social success. He treats Eliza as an experiment rather than a human being, often displaying misogynistic and condescending behavior. While he takes pride in his ability to transform her, he fails to recognize her humanity. His inability to see Eliza as an equal ultimately isolates him, reinforcing Shaw’s critique of male dominance and elitism.

3. Colonel Pickering

Pickering serves as a contrast to Higgins—he is kind, respectful, and treats Eliza with dignity. While he is also part of the bet, his approach is more humane. His character represents the possibility of education and refinement without cruelty or arrogance.

4. Alfred Doolittle

Eliza’s father, Alfred Doolittle, provides comic relief but also embodies Shaw’s views on morality and social hypocrisy. A dustman who prides himself on his lack of responsibility, he ironically finds himself thrust into the middle class when an unexpected inheritance forces him to adopt the very bourgeois values he once despised. His character satirizes the idea that wealth automatically leads to moral superiority.

Use of Comedy in Pygmalion

Despite its serious themes, Pygmalion is filled with humor, much of it deriving from the clash between classes and the absurdity of social expectations. The following elements contribute to its comedic brilliance:

1. Witty Dialogue

Shaw’s sharp dialogue, especially in the exchanges between Higgins and Eliza, creates humor while delivering biting social commentary.

2. Situational Irony

Eliza’s transformation leads to unintended consequences—while Higgins believes he is creating a refined lady, he ultimately creates an independent woman who defies his control.

3. Satirical Elements

The play mocks the rigidity of British social norms, showing how superficial and arbitrary they are. Alfred Doolittle’s unexpected rise in status, for example, is an ironic twist that highlights the absurdity of class distinctions.

Relevance of Pygmalion Today

Pygmalion remains relevant as it addresses universal issues of class, gender, and identity. The idea that language and appearance dictate one’s social standing is still evident in modern society, where accents, fashion, and mannerisms continue to influence perception and opportunities.

Furthermore, the play’s feminist undertones resonate with contemporary discussions on women’s autonomy and self-definition. Eliza’s journey from dependence to independence mirrors the struggles of many women in asserting their identity in a male-dominated world.

The theme of transformation is also significant in today’s culture of self-improvement, where people are constantly expected to “reinvent” themselves to fit societal expectations. Shaw’s critique serves as a reminder that true self-worth comes from within rather than external validation.

Conclusion

George Bernard Shaw’s Pygmalion is much more than a comedy about speech lessons—it is a profound critique of social structures, gender roles, and the illusion of transformation. Through Eliza Doolittle’s journey, Shaw challenges the notion that class and identity are fixed by birth, arguing instead that true worth lies in self-respect and independence. With its timeless themes and sharp wit, Pygmalion continues to captivate audiences and provoke thought, making it a masterpiece of modern drama.

The Proposal by Anton Chekhov

 

Introduction :

Anton Chekhov, one of the most influential playwrights of the 19th century, is celebrated for his sharp wit, masterful storytelling, and keen observations of human nature. His one-act farce, The Proposal (first performed in 1890), exemplifies his ability to weave humor and social commentary into a tightly constructed comedic narrative. The play satirizes the materialistic and often absurd nature of marriage negotiations in the Russian aristocracy, making it a timeless and universally relatable piece of literature.

Plot Summary

The Proposal revolves around three characters: Ivan Vassilevitch Lomov, a long-time neighbor of the Chubukov family; Stepan Stepanovitch Chubukov, a landowner; and his daughter, Natalia Stepanovna. The play begins with Lomov visiting Chubukov to formally ask for Natalia’s hand in marriage. Initially, Chubukov is delighted and immediately gives his blessing. However, the situation takes a comically unexpected turn when Lomov and Natalia engage in a heated argument over the ownership of a piece of land called Oxen Meadows.

Lomov, who is highly anxious and suffers from heart palpitations, tries to convince Natalia of his claim to the land, while she vehemently argues in favor of her family's ownership. Their argument escalates into a full-fledged dispute, and Chubukov joins in, siding with his daughter. The discussion shifts from property ownership to Lomov’s physical ailments, further fueling their quarrel. In the end, despite their continuous fighting, Chubukov forces them into an engagement, valuing social and economic benefits over genuine affection.

Themes in The Proposal

1. The Absurdity of Marriage Negotiations

Chekhov critiques the way marriage, often considered a sacred bond, becomes a mere business transaction among the aristocracy. Lomov’s proposal is not driven by love but by practicality—he sees Natalia as a suitable match because of her family's wealth and status. Similarly, Chubukov eagerly supports the proposal, not out of concern for his daughter’s happiness but for financial security and social prestige.

2. Materialism and Social Status

Material wealth and land ownership are central concerns in the play. Instead of discussing love or compatibility, Lomov and Natalia focus on property disputes, revealing how materialistic concerns overshadow emotions in aristocratic marriages. Chubukov, despite being initially hospitable, quickly shows his greed and eagerness to secure the marriage, reinforcing the idea that financial considerations dominate personal relationships in this social class.

3. Hypocrisy in Society

Chubukov's character epitomizes social hypocrisy. At first, he warmly welcomes Lomov, calling him “his dear friend,” but when an argument breaks out, he insults and berates him. His sudden shift from friendly to hostile behavior exposes the fickle nature of human relationships in a society where personal gain dictates interactions.

4. Conflict and Pettiness in Human Nature

The characters' quarrels over trivial issues highlight the tendency of people to prioritize ego and pride over meaningful relationships. Lomov and Natalia are supposed to be partners, yet they argue over a piece of land and hunting dogs. Their constant bickering underscores how trivial disputes can overshadow essential matters, reflecting Chekhov’s keen insight into human nature.

5. Satirical Representation of Aristocracy

Chekhov’s play ridicules the Russian gentry, exposing their superficial concerns and lack of depth. Instead of engaging in intellectual or philosophical discussions, they argue over petty matters, demonstrating their shallowness. Their exaggerated emotions and outbursts add to the comedic effect while highlighting the absurdity of their values.

Character Analysis

1. Ivan Vassilevitch Lomov

Lomov is a hypochondriac, nervous, and socially awkward landowner who is desperate to marry Natalia, not out of love but due to societal expectations. His frequent complaints about his health and his quick temper make him a comically exaggerated character. Despite his intentions of proposing, he repeatedly finds himself in arguments, revealing his inability to maintain stable relationships.

2. Stepan Stepanovitch Chubukov

Chubukov is a classic representation of a hypocritical and opportunistic aristocrat. He pretends to be friendly but quickly turns hostile during disagreements. His eagerness to see his daughter married off, regardless of the circumstances, exposes the materialistic approach to marriage in Russian high society.

3. Natalia Stepanovna

Natalia is a strong-willed, argumentative, and somewhat naive young woman. While she is intelligent and independent, she also gets caught up in trivial arguments, showing that she is as absorbed in petty concerns as the men around her. Despite her initial fury towards Lomov, she quickly shifts her stance when she realizes he came to propose, demonstrating her own materialistic motivations.

Use of Comedy in The Proposal

Chekhov employs various comedic elements to enhance the play’s satirical tone:

1. Situational Irony

Lomov visits the Chubukov household with the intent of proposing, yet he ends up arguing for most of the play. The irony of a marriage proposal turning into a heated debate over land ownership adds to the comedic absurdity.

2. Exaggerated Character Traits

Each character is exaggerated for comedic effect. Lomov’s hypochondria, Chubukov’s fickleness, and Natalia’s stubbornness make their interactions highly dramatic and amusing.

3. Rapid Dialogue and Miscommunication

The characters’ fast-paced dialogue, filled with misunderstandings and interruptions, creates a lively and chaotic atmosphere. Their inability to have a simple conversation without it devolving into an argument reflects the dysfunctional nature of their relationships.

4. Physical Comedy

Lomov’s exaggerated physical symptoms, such as his palpitations and nervous breakdowns, add a slapstick element to the play. His dramatic reactions contrast with the trivial nature of the disputes, enhancing the humor.

Relevance of The Proposal Today

Despite being written in the late 19th century, The Proposal remains relevant as it addresses universal themes such as materialism, social status, and human folly. In many societies, marriage is still influenced by financial and social considerations rather than emotional compatibility. The play also highlights the tendency of people to engage in unnecessary disputes, a phenomenon still observed in modern interpersonal relationships.

Additionally, Chekhov’s satirical portrayal of aristocracy can be extended to contemporary discussions about privilege and elitism. The exaggerated concerns of his characters mirror the preoccupations of many upper-class individuals who prioritize wealth and status over genuine human connections.

Conclusion

Anton Chekhov’s The Proposal is a brilliant satirical farce that mocks the absurdity of marriage negotiations and the pettiness of human nature. Through humor and irony, he exposes the superficial concerns of the Russian gentry, making the play a timeless piece that continues to entertain and provoke thought. With its engaging characters, rapid-fire dialogue, and sharp social commentary, The Proposal remains one of Chekhov’s most memorable and widely performed comedies, proving that human folly transcends time and culture.